Re: Anna Hazare arrested by Delhi police ahead of today's fast.
Shripad said:
I still dont understand what you guys are on about giving "all the power" to one person.
Its not about one person its about the lok pal commitee, an unelected body that has ultimate power over everybody.
You don't see a problem with this ?
There are ways of allwoing the lok pal to prosecute those found guilty by various commisions, this is the main goal. We have tons of committees, but all they can do is make recommendations in reports but cannot go after anyone. So this movement is trying to solve that problem.
Thing is, is only hazares way right or not. They claim it is, but there could be other ways, as well. which neither the govt or hazare are addressing.
Shripad said:
No one person will have ultimate power. You need to understand how things are drafted. One person even if all powerful, within judicial or extra judicial system that are proposed will think twice about misusing his position if there is transparency. But transparency alone is not enough, there needs to be a fear of ramifications for your action. In perfect world, it wont be needed. But it is needed in real world.
I like subramaniam swamy's idea of independent prosecutors. he says the prevention of corruption act in section 5 allows the appointment of such. But its not been tested yet. the govt claims only govt lawyers can act as prosecutors.
In fact in one of his talks he says he does not see the point of lok pal because he has already had good responses & results by the judiciary already. So this guy is showing you can use the existing system and achieve acceptable results. Thats not to say lok pal is not required at all.
Shripad said:
This bill does not give undue power to anyone. This bill provides a infrastructure which a common man, opposition or ruling party or basically anyone can put forward his grievances regarding those in power or are elected in office and have them investigated without fear of political pressure or prejudice against him. This bill will also make people come forward and blow the whistle when someone witnesses a act of corruption rather than be a mute witness.
The scope of this bill and the proposed post of Lokayukta ends at that. He does not have any power to punish / investigate anyone for anything other than corruption charges.
The problem is how to ensure it does not get abused for political reasons. You could stall govt with the right tactics isn't it. You can go after anyone and harass them with frivolous cases.
Shripad said:
As far as bribery goes. We have reached to the bottom limit of the sinkhole. A honest man or businessman cannot start or run his business these days without bribery because without paying bribe, he cannot work. This has to stop somewhere and it began with RTI. It needs to get stronger and the next step is lokpal bill. After that the system needs to filter down to all government departments with stronger system at state and municipal levels.
The aim is to reduce corruption in govt, not society.
Shripad said:
All these protests till now, and there has not been act of violence even with 1000s of people that are out there protesting. That tells you something about this movement.
Attempt to commit suicide is illegal for the very reason to stop fasts to death.
--- Updated Post - Automerged ---
Renegade said:
My attention span is very limited and lines like these make it harder to continue reading.
There is a difference between resorting to and succumbing to. Not every middle class initiates these 'transactions'. Some people just have to pay a premium as without that the work will not get done at all. It would be unfair to classify all on the same boat.
Ok, so you object to the generalisation -- that the middle classes are by & large corrupt themselves and have little moral standing in supporting this bill.
The only ppl that can afford to give bribes are the moneyed ones. Or do the poor have to find money to get the job done as well ?
If you have the money then you can get things done faster, a poorer person will not be able to bribe for too long.
So what i'm asking is how prevalent is bribery in our society. To get an idea of whether the generalisation has some standing or not.
If you're buying property or trying to put your kids in school, i think it would be very difficult to avoid at some point or another.