Re: Anna Hazare arrested by Delhi police ahead of today's fast.
The more i read the counters, the more convinced i become of my position. So thx for helping with that
johnie1 said:
When this govt was elected then it was a legitimate one.Now when they have flouted all the norms of legitimacy then they have become illegitimate.Is it not true?.Look at this govt.There is Mr Pawar,Mr 15 Percent kamalnath(according to radia tapes)etc.The primeminister has even flouted the law.He says he is a resident of assam whereas he is a resident of delhi.So do you still think this govt is a legitimate one?
Then get the opposition to go for a no confidence vote. Thats how the system works.
Why haven't they dont that yet, maybe, just maybe they are better at gauging support of the ppl then you are.
johnie1 said:
Why is the govt so hesitant to bring in a strong lokpal bill?
Will give you the answer when i FINISH reading & understanding both bills.
johnie1 said:
Is not a strong lokpal bill in the interests of the people?
The bigger question is feasible & viable. Can the LP they want perform the stated functions. If they can they become effective otherwise not. But i cant tell you this yet. I'm not ready.
johnie1 said:
If so since the govt is formed by the people should it not implement the strong lokpal bill ?.(I know the fallacy you will point out is who are the people).So when the govt does not wish to follow the people's interest does not the govt become illegitimate?
Tell me how much support the LP movement has ? i am unable to determine the strength of this movement and until that can be done then you cannot claim that it is wholy representative of the ppls wishes.
johnie1 said:
The govt is very clever afterall it is headed by lawyers.
What makes you think the LP movement doesn't have lawyers, they have quite a few on the team and even a supreme court lawyer.
Salman khurshid. the law mnister made it clear last night that if the govt had acted out of its remit then they would have immediately gone to the high court or supreme court and had the order quashed. Did the LP movement do this ? NO Therefore the govt was within its rights to act as it did.
johnie1 said:
If they would not have considered the lokpal bill even once that would have given the critics a handle to beat the govt with.Exactly the same allegations as you have levelled.ie a dictatorship etc.So they showed themselves as caring for bill and then at the last moment veered off the track hoping no one will notice or will not make so much noise.
I'm not sure on this bit, i can say that they failed to reach an agreement. That does not mean the fight is over, keep lobbying & protesting, all of these thigns are legal. There are many ways to legally protest in this country.
johnie1 said:
Well they were wrong.They say parliament is supreme saying it alone has the right to make laws.But what if the laws made do not reflect the people's views but that of the members ie the corrupt members.
The problem is not the laws, the problem is a lack of laws that allow prosecution.
johnie1 said:
Onto a slightly another topic.Sonia Gandhi is the defacto leader of this govt and also she is the head of the largest party in the govt.Has she ever given an interview?,interacted with the press?.So how can the public know what her views are?.Why no accountability to the people.If there is no accountability then is this really a democracy?.
She does not run the country, the PM does. Does the PM give interviews ? if he had to do that then he would not have time to be a PM.
So there are plenty of spokesppl to do it. I dont see any argument in this last quote of yours.