blr_p
Oracle
Re: Anna Hazare arrested by Delhi police ahead of today's fast.
I still think the lok satta guy has a point, it should not require a hunger strike & mass protests to get your grievances addressed. That this happens and is considered the only way out points to a glaring problem with the system. Its incapabe of serving its ppl. So if AH asks for a citizens charter then this i think is a step in the right direction. A service guarantee that govt will do what it says and is time bound. This i can certainly see as a positive.
Think of a couple, the woman gets fed up with the ways of the unresponsive man and throws a fit.
State is the guy, the ppl are the woman.
Ppl are the state's boss, well that also applies in this case
No, i don't think its only that. There are legitimate emotions invovled here that get ppl out there.Shripad said:Who do you think its media spectacle only.
right, it starts to make more sense when you look at it from an emotional angle. Ppl feeling abused by govt that is unresponsive or perceived that way. Unresponsive might be an understatement, maybe abused is more appropriate. The govt's dodgy, the cops are dodgy, who is there to protect & compain to in that case. nobody, there is no hope that things will ever improve. So this govt is not good and needs to be challenged within reason.Shripad said:I was there passing over at Azad maidan here. You really had to see the environment here. And there were 10000s of people on road supporting this in Mumbai which was not even the primary location. I dont even live in major population area. I live in the extreme outskirts of Mumbai and still I got to see soo many people supporting this. IT was definitely not a minority. When there is majority or equal opposition to something we usually see protesters from both sides. Here there were no protests against this movement. Why? Because this was for the right reason in principle. When thats the case, you dont see any majority public opposition to it. And whatever little opposition is there is totally outnumbered.
okShripad said:Its a number game. If it wasnt, there was no reason for government to back down. Government which has such strong majority in centre will only bend if they see no other choice and no logical reason to continue opposing it. Opposing something that is fundamentally right by taking the support of technicality, methodology or tradition never works. Khurshid was ripped apart on a talk show when he tried to justify the arrest saying this is not the first time this has been done. He had no answer when he was told to justify the governments opposition on the principles. You are quoting today's interview. See the one on 2nd or 3rd day of the agitation.
Well, i picked up a study guide on our constitution as its something that more need to understand.Shripad said:And yes, if the demand is justified, peaceful protests like indefinite fasts are totally justified and within the constitution of our nation. Hell there was someone (I dont remember who or on which channel was that debate going on. It was on 5th or 6th day of protest where a young man doing socialism studies put forward his point of this agitation being justified under the duties of citizen defined in our constitution. I will try to dig up any link of that on youtube (it was posted on youtube) and the government representative had no answers for him.
I still think the lok satta guy has a point, it should not require a hunger strike & mass protests to get your grievances addressed. That this happens and is considered the only way out points to a glaring problem with the system. Its incapabe of serving its ppl. So if AH asks for a citizens charter then this i think is a step in the right direction. A service guarantee that govt will do what it says and is time bound. This i can certainly see as a positive.
Yes, this position has changed in the last week.Shripad said:You dont have to believe in Media, you just have to look outside and whats happening outside. Its simply statistically impossible for majority including foreign media to support or portray a picture that is fundamentally incorrect in todays age.
Have you considered that it was simply this way because it was true or that it had merit?
And again, justify the presence of corruption to maintain double digit growth. And BTW, we are not maintaining double digit growth. We never have since 1966 with exception of temporary spikes that lasted for a quarter or so.
I would say using a ratoinal frame of mind does not work with an emotional argument.Shripad said:Majority of arguments are procedural arguments. Those never hold when it comes to a social movement of the masses. That is why this has been successful so far.
Think of a couple, the woman gets fed up with the ways of the unresponsive man and throws a fit.
State is the guy, the ppl are the woman.
Ppl are the state's boss, well that also applies in this case