blr_p
Skilled
Sure, if its not wrong then maybe objectionable is a better word.Mephistopheles said:Who says it has suddenly become wrong? Now, there is more awareness regarding this that is why the disscussion
Part of the reason for asking WHY it is objectionable is because it needs to be articulated in an unambiguous manner to the ppl that follow this practice. It's THEIR mind that has to be changed.Mephistopheles said:To me it is simply inhumane to just throw away corpses in the river for some belief system, and also a kind of insult to the dead. It also is very unpleasant to see and smell and also is harmful for the apparently sacred river.
This leads to the next question of WHY they do it in the first place ?
Assuming a lack of education is behind this practice then sure, can do what you just described here and give it a few decades to seep inMephistopheles said:No, that was not what I intended to convey. With education, a person will have some basic idea about the world and would make the person realize what religion and these customs actually are. These are just society-made provisions for the benefit of the society itself, and not to follow blindly and cause harm to oneself. If a person does not have money for firewood, bury the corpse rather than throwing it away in the holy river just because "religion" preaches so.
The religious spots are the most dirtiest in this country, people have no regard for the environment whatsoever, they just want to convey their prayers in hope of a better future for themselves. With education, atleast people will have have a basic sense of hygiene and how to conduct things. If religion is something in which people really believe, then I reckon the religious spots should not be in the condition they are now. Education brings a certain degree of required awareness so that a person can think logically and make positive decisions for oneself.
The article i linked to earlier mentioned it in passing and did not make it the basis for the story. My understanding is that this is common knowledge amongst those that go to the Ganges on a regular basis.kuld33p said:While I was coming back home, I was thinking about it..
I have more thoughts.. If we were doing something like this does not mean that we did not know if it was right or wrong earlier.. A lot of people like me who object these things would have existed in the past as well. But since we've got means to express our thought are available everywhere we hear these opinions.. otherwise you used to hear these stuff in news papers only when internet was not so available in india.. (would not say popular, because it was there but again due to our corrupt politicians/government it took us ages to get our hands on something which is an ancient technology in the world.)
I see you fell for that hoax aka blood libel. Anyway, what they do in their country is upto them, this is about what happens in our country and what we think about it or what foreigners will think about usmalhotraraul said:has someone gone to their freaking country & seen them eating HUMAN FETUS the ones which are aborted, ends up in their kitchen.
The bolded bit is interesting as it deals with the WHY. Do ppl agree that they are too poor to cremate their dead ?malhotraraul said:they put the body in the Ganges because the major reason is that they cannot afford it, they are very poor & the PANDAS are very ruthless & do not pity, they even demolished the cremation chamber made by the government where poor people could burn the body for much less because no wood is used, because it was taking away their business.
In which case can we say there is no religous basis behind these practices other than just poverty ?