FaH33m said:
^ In that case all the models that you heard were underpowered. Anyways could you share details of the store where you auditioned the AKG-701s ,M50 and Shure SRH-840 ? These are the models I would love to audition .
yea man, totally agree.. without amps u just cant buy em. But the sound signature even though underpowered was crisp, clear and the mids and highs were exactly where they belonged.
Faheem especially the shure imo.. ofcourse they were underpowered and post amps d results might change
But then, a very obvious question.. wouldn't you go the way of a denon for say 7.5k for the 1001's instead of buying these at 8-13k and another 7-8k for amps??? (by amps i mean more like ibasso or arrow and now e5's or even my amps like yamaha or marantz)
D denon 1001's were seriously no slouch.. For a bass lover like myself, they were just perfect.
dOm1naTOr said:
its not me... its the guys at head-fi who's saying that.
ya man, thats what i meant... that its just 1 guy there saying it and its not even a review.
ok just for ur knowledge, in the sennheiser 400 series, leaving out the 448 and the 485, all the rest have a sq to particular genres. Even i didn't know this earlier till i met someone at sennheiser and he explained it to me. infact even the 448 lean towards pmp then a more general multi purpose.
The thing is bro, till today evening i had not tried out most companies.. today i tried out the shure, akg and audio technicas and guess what, the SS of all of em was different.. basically for 5-6k or the 10 or 15k u put in, there is something ur getting back in return which is quiet different from say cans which r worth 3-4k..