madnav said:
the whole of the world has learn alot about politics and tactics from one man and i think he does deserve some credit on these some of the things irrespective of his ultimate motive.
He had very talented ppl working under him.
madnav said:
tthe had a personality which interested almost every german, and it was not religious faction but patriotism...that is what makes him so charismatic and bold for some of us despite of the deeds.
Once he got the SS going, anyone that disagreed with him ended up dead. The charisma bit worked to get a majority over the dissenters but those were the early sweet talking days, the nasty stuff came out, predictably, when his control was total.
And this is where TOTAL control of the media and propaganda is essential, Goebbels ensured his public perception was positive.
madnav said:
He surely went crazy later but he had conquered the most of europe and russia at a moment..
Most of europe ? No
Russia ? are you kidding, the Russians broke him and let the Americans finish him off.
madnav said:
it only reflect a great management skill along with political and military.
Only in the initial stages, his double crossing Russia was a very big blunder amongst many.
madnav said:
heck even russians wanted hitler to rule than stalin.
Like hell they did !! (you made that one up didnt you
)
madnav said:
unlike hitler, stalin did not come into power by election.. russians hated his ruthlessness, but surely the world odes not look upon him with similar disgrace as he joined forces with UK later on.
Depends which world you ask, Stalin was responsible for millions of deaths of his own ppl, those that did not agree got sent to Siberia. Hitler caused untold damage to his own ppl as well as his country.
This is why I think you can't just look at the positives of these ppl and ignore the negatives because the negatives trumped the positives by an overwhelming margin.
What good ultimately were these so called patriots for their ppl or their country ?
