Decadent_Spectre
Forerunner
All 13th and 14th gen consumer CPUs are affected afaik - including laptops ones. IIrc Lenovo and HP gaming laptops with 13th and 14th gen processors are already affected and are showing BSODsDoes this also affect mobile,workstation,server CPUs? Or are only desktop CPUs affected?
All 13th and 14th gen consumer CPUs are affected afaik - including laptops ones. IIrc Lenovo and HP gaming laptops with 13th and 14th gen processors are already affected and are showing BSODs
I think amd just paying legacy costs. There was a time amd were bad compared to intel. They came around. With the x3d processors and other processors in that timeline amd surpassed Intel. It's just better engineering. Intel needs to catch up rather than play bs p core e core and microcoded patches. Future Intel needs better engineering not better pr and propaganda. Crowd is wiser now.ROFLIntel Will Not Recall Failing 13th and 14th Gen CPUs
It's official, Intel will not issue a recall for its failing 13th and 14th gen CPUs, despite the problem being much bigger than initially thought. The company was approached by The Verge and the answers to the questions asked, are not looking great. First of all, it appears that at least all 65...www.techpowerup.com
I realize this conversation is diverging a bit, but I wanted to share my experience. When running the P-cores on my 14700KF at anything over 5.7 GHz, games would crash and not accept the higher clock speeds. Modern Warfare 3 was the main culprit. However, everything runs fine at stock speeds. I chose the 14700KF mainly for its cores, which allow me to run many virtual machines.
After comparing it to the 14900K, I found the latter to be overly expensive. I didn't go for AMD because VMware Workstation has its own set of issues with it. Otherwise, I would have considered the 7900X3D. However, at 4K, the CPU's influence diminishes, making performance more GPU-bound.
I thus far I have been using it only for day-to-day ops ........ but all this dissection here on TE of Intel's mammoth blunder plus latest NEWS is STRESSING me out each day ...... It's like me living my life each day at 60 today - knowing my clock is ticking and anything anytime may go ..... lolIf you use it only for basic day to day operations then you probably won't notice it as it won't put a stress on the chip.
@Fenix - it applies to all forms of LIFE - Living Creatures by the Higher Power or Human Created Machines - LOLBut that applies to every hardware, isn't it.
But that applies to every hardware, isn't it.
When the p/e cores were introduced the first thing that came to my mind was "wow Intel can't seem to fight cores vs cores with AMD anymore".I think amd just paying legacy costs. There was a time amd were bad compared to intel. They came around. With the x3d processors and other processors in that timeline amd surpassed Intel. It's just better engineering. Intel needs to catch up rather than play bs p core e core and microcoded patches. Future Intel needs better engineering not better pr and propaganda. Crowd is wiser now.
Intel failed horribly with 10900K, their only 10C/20T consumer CPU so they went back to 8C/16T on 11900K. To this day, they haven't produced a single consumer CPU with more than 8 actual cores and yet they still failed at it too. They should stick with 4C/8T CPU.When the p/e cores were introduced the first thing that came to my mind was "wow Intel can't seem to fight cores vs cores with AMD anymore".
I don't care what anyone says, this whole p/e thing is just marketing in the guise of innovation to me. Even if it might not be 100% correct it still says something about the real world performance issues.
The Snapdragon X series powering the latest Windows on ARM devices are built on TSMC's 4nm processWould TSMC be interested in this PC business? Hmm...
Built on 10++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ node.Intel failed horribly with 10900K, their only 10C/20T consumer CPU so they went back to 8C/16T on 11900K. To this day, they haven't produced a single consumer CPU with more than 8 actual cores and yet they still failed at it too. They should stick with 4C/8T CPU.
That's lingo for almost always "make investors richer". Don't read into it too much.them cutting jobs may be just reconstruction
The savings always come at the expense of firing workers lower in the chain while keeping executive incentives intact, whose decisions in the first place resulted in the turmoil.It is assumed that they will save 10 billion USD.