zhopudey said:Everything, and I mean everything, can be boiled down to morality vs convenience
well morality is just a by-product of convenience so....in the end it just comes down to convenience
zhopudey said:Everything, and I mean everything, can be boiled down to morality vs convenience
windhawk91 said:@ Jerin
You definitely cannot justify piracy lol
thetoxicmind said:And they buy Legit stuff as well??? Perhaps you shouldn't be borrowing it if it weren't legit !
!
sydras said:Hmm..I've not seen anyone mention some of the practical hassles in buying legitimate software.
Most of these companies are overseas and do not have an indian presence. They require payment using credit card for online purchases. Many people esp. students don't have access to one. Apart from that, some softwares and/or keys must be shipped to your address. This would be a big hassle for most people for overseas purchases.
W.r.t buying popular software from a local store, I always have fear about whether say a game I purchase from a shop will actually work on my system. I find it difficult to convince a dealer that it's not working on my system when in all probability, he would assume that I copied it and am now returning the CD.
Most softwares are not worth paying for. And at a time, we download and install so many softwares that we probably have limited use for and many times, we wish that the software would be easier to use or have more features etc and we don't feel like paying for them.
Then there are other things like being a guinea pig for competing technologies. An example would be - why should I have to pay for WinZip and WinRAR...after all they do the same job? Is it my fault that there are two types of compressed archives? I can use the same argument for realmedia and quicktime files. The sheer volume of options available makes it difficult to determine which softwares I should pay for.
Then comes the question on just how many capabilities should I pay for. Most people expect these capabilities to be present as they have already paid for the hardware and the OS. At the very least, they expect the OS to have these capabilities.
So my points are
1) Paying for software isn't as simple as paying for hardware because of varying standards, difficulty in quantifying utility, too many options, where do I stop paying etc.
2) The process of overseas payment for software and pricing needs to be greatly simplified for legitimate software to gain ground in India. IMO, they should first focus on ensuring a proper medium for purchase with reasonable pricing and a money back guarantee if the product does not work on your system like it should. Then they can talk about piracy.
Party Monger said:The developers can easily earn lot by charging for support..
Stolen's a strong word. It's copyrighted content that the owner wasn't paid for.
high prices encourage piracy but offer the company offsetting advantages. If Microsoft sold Windows for, say, $10, it would lose money on every copy because of manufacturing, distribution and support costs. At zero cost to Microsoft, piracy enhances network effects by getting Windows out to users who can’t or won’t pay, without undercutting normal prices.
They like us to feel guilty – to think that piracy is wrong and immoral. Economically, it’s not necessarily true, but it resonates with the public.
- A lot of ppl here (zhops i'm looking at you) said if the laws were tighter they would not do it. So is the answer even stricter laws ?
Err, what softwares? Microsoft, Adobe, Symantec, Autodesk and a whole lot of others are directly available here.Most of these companies are overseas and do not have an indian presence. They require payment using credit card for online purchases. Many people esp. students don't have access to one. Apart from that, some softwares and/or keys must be shipped to your address. This would be a big hassle for most people for overseas purchases.
W.r.t buying popular software from a local store, I always have fear about whether say a game I purchase from a shop will actually work on my system. I find it difficult to convince a dealer that it's not working on my system when in all probability, he would assume that I copied it and am now returning the CD.
My god! Dude, what do you mean by - "we don't feel like paying for them" :S Again, sorry for the hardware analogy - but if I buy a dslr camera but use it only in auto mode, I should not be paying for it, right?Most softwares are not worth paying for. And at a time, we download and install so many softwares that we probably have limited use for and many times, we wish that the software would be easier to use or have more features etc and we don't feel like paying for them.
Ok, I'll have to give up now. You pay for what you want to use. Which means, if you don't want to pay, you don't use. Do you pay only 20% for a movie ticket if you want to watch only 20mins?Then there are other things like being a guinea pig for competing technologies. An example would be - why should I have to pay for WinZip and WinRAR...after all they do the same job? Is it my fault that there are two types of compressed archives? I can use the same argument for realmedia and quicktime files. The sheer volume of options available makes it difficult to determine which softwares I should pay for.
Then comes the question on just how many capabilities should I pay for. Most people expect these capabilities to be present as they have already paid for the hardware and the OS. At the very least, they expect the OS to have these capabilities.
So my points are
1) Paying for software isn't as simple as paying for hardware because of varying standards, difficulty in quantifying utility, too many options, where do I stop paying etc.
2) The process of overseas payment for software and pricing needs to be greatly simplified for legitimate software to gain ground in India. IMO, they should first focus on ensuring a proper medium for purchase with reasonable pricing and a money back guarantee if the product does not work on your system like it should. Then they can talk about piracy.
grinning cat said:They like us to feel guilty – to think that piracy is wrong and immoral. Economically, it’s not necessarily true, but it resonates with the public.