- Hamas‘s attack on Israel was wrong and deplorable - period
How many protesters agree with you on that point? None!.. and I've tried to demonstrate this from numerous sources around the world. More would be good but I think we all get the point.
More importantly, polls show 70% of Gazans and closer to 80% in Judea & Samaria celebrate Oct 7 as a victory.
Follow up questions are
- Does Israel have a right to exist?
- Does Israel have a right to self defense?
All pertinent questions by the former UK home minister got zero responses. Instead we get some critique that these are not appropriate questions.
Such mental gymnastics to dodge the questions and some have been quite creative.
The answer to both those follow up questions is a resounding No by Palestinians.
The reason these protests happened is people cannot figure out who the bad guys were on Oct 7. Why?
yet somehow the “accidental” killing of over 30K regular folks in Gaza is absolutely fine with many
And if that weren’t enough, anyone who feels or states otherwise is gaslighted!
Why is over 30k a problem and not over 10k?
Why is 30k a problem and not 60k?
Do you see the problem. Some arbitrary number has been thrown in. A bogus humanitarian argument is being made that has no relevance as far as the rules of war are concerned. Which is the standard, world governments, particularly democracies are held to.
There is a further problem with this specious argument. How are democracies supposed to defend themselves in the future? Because the implication is only so much and no more.
It gives a pass to terrorists worldwide that they can attack with impunity because 'world opinion' will defend them. That after a conflict they will be left standing. Free to reconstitute and attack in the future whenever appropriate at a time and place of their choosing. This is a recipe for endless conflict because the perpetrators will never be completely defeated.
Why was there peace after WW2? Because Germany & Japan were totally defeated. Nobody stepped in just as the allies and Russians were closing in on Berlin and said stop. Too many have died. The consensus was to finish the job.
Then again after the collapse of the soviet union. We entered an era of global peace and unprecedented prosperity not known in the past.
When Israel says they are fighting for the rest of civilisation, they are right. Any negative precedents set here affect future conflicts. Who's to say all will abide. Why does Hamas not get asked the hard questions?
But the immediate result is Israel's surrender to a war they didn't even start. Hamas win. THIS is what your post boils down to. So which argument is an attempt at gaslighting here ? This 30k figure you throw about
For Israel every civilian death is a tragedy. For Hamas it's a strategy.