Post your in-game screenshots & gameplay videos
- Thread starter Blade_Runner
- Start date
arun_rulezzz
Discoverer
Re: The post your in-game screenshot's thread
thats so bad.. i had high hopes for that game and now i dont think im going to play it at all : S
thats so bad.. i had high hopes for that game and now i dont think im going to play it at all : S
saumilsingh
Galvanizer
Re: The post your in-game screenshot's thread
This game has nice bots. Quite human feeling.
Or I suck.
This game has nice bots. Quite human feeling.
Or I suck.
Re: The post your in-game screenshot's thread
thats the wonder of crysis ... believe it or not ..iam running the game on the third mode "good performance"... the other modes were good visuals , best visuals and best performance ... @ 1440x900 4x AF ... FPS over 40 all the time ... so i think the multiplayer is more tweaked or it may be the smaller maps doing the trick ... coz any stutter in a multi game is really annoying
dsarosh said:
thats the wonder of crysis ... believe it or not ..iam running the game on the third mode "good performance"... the other modes were good visuals , best visuals and best performance ... @ 1440x900 4x AF ... FPS over 40 all the time ... so i think the multiplayer is more tweaked or it may be the smaller maps doing the trick ... coz any stutter in a multi game is really annoying
saumilsingh
Galvanizer
Re: The post your in-game screenshot's thread
RRLL or LLRR (can't remember which) = Invisibility
BBBB = Boosterdsarosh said:
RRLL or LLRR (can't remember which) = Invisibility
Re: The post your in-game screenshot's thread
yup..i guess the original crysis engine is more optimised in wars ...cant use best visuals under Dx9 mode same as original crysis...ny ways i usually play IA ..mostly cost or graveyard @good performance and 1680x1050 with 8x AF ..and still avg out 50fps on a HD 4850.
at good performance in wars vs mainstream in warhead..IMO wars looks better.
ajex said:
yup..i guess the original crysis engine is more optimised in wars ...cant use best visuals under Dx9 mode same as original crysis...ny ways i usually play IA ..mostly cost or graveyard @good performance and 1680x1050 with 8x AF ..and still avg out 50fps on a HD 4850.
at good performance in wars vs mainstream in warhead..IMO wars looks better.
deathvirus_me
Explorer
Re: The post your in-game screenshot's thread
STALKER Clear Sky , running at 1280*1024 dx9 , 24 hrs. god rays
, custom settings ..
STALKER Clear Sky , running at 1280*1024 dx9 , 24 hrs. god rays
, custom settings ..Re: The post your in-game screenshot's thread
Nothing in comparison with other people's screenies
1280X720, some custom setttings on x1950pro and E6300
Btw i cant seem to make a custom resolution..when i do r_width/height and enter the value, it goes to that res for a sec and then back to 1280X720 :S
Nothing in comparison with other people's screenies
1280X720, some custom setttings on x1950pro and E6300
Btw i cant seem to make a custom resolution..when i do r_width/height and enter the value, it goes to that res for a sec and then back to 1280X720 :S
Re: The post your in-game screenshot's thread
its the realistic lighting of crysis that makes it look awesome.
Older games had good textures, but the lighting was ok.
Crysis has awesome lighting effects.
Im trying hard to not buy a card anytime soon, after going through 10 agp cards int he past couple of years I decided not to do the same with pci-e cards... but seems reall hard to resist.
its the realistic lighting of crysis that makes it look awesome.
Older games had good textures, but the lighting was ok.
Crysis has awesome lighting effects.
Im trying hard to not buy a card anytime soon, after going through 10 agp cards int he past couple of years I decided not to do the same with pci-e cards... but seems reall hard to resist.
