Rockyme2002 said:so which is it nd vdimm???
msg noted ...and understood.and edited my previous(above) post accordingly ..SunMysore said:No it isnt...
Its My BH-5 it isnt mask's OCZ Muhuhuhahahahaha
SunMysore posted 1.17 minutes later:
FYI Deejay, i bouht a couple of BH-5 sticks yesterday...these are those sticks...hehehehe
SunMysore posted 5.4 minutes later:
i hate u deej :cursing: check ur MSN inbox and come online on MSN.....
You sure about this? Dint see any difference shifting it to 16 cycles, but shifted them under your recommendation. Seen a lot of people especially on DFI street having this setting at 256 cycles as well. These were the "optimized defaults" in the DFI , i dint mess around with any of the other settings except the CAS latency, RAS to CAS latency, etc . thats why its at the default 256 setting.PCJedi said:Crazy Eddy - Your DRAM Idle timer is set to 256.
Your page will not be closed for 256 Cycles. that sets of any performance increments set by a CAS of 1.5. and more important in applications which use RAM a lot, including GAMES , you Pc will become 256 times slower (that was a joke)
I havent been able to find 512MB variants of these at all, else i'd have got em too. Sunny's hoping for 4x256MB sticks to make it a total of 1GB. But official word from DFI street is 4 sticks will run at DDR333/2T on Winnies and DDR400/2T on Venice/San Diego/X2. Of course there is the thing about 512MB sticks being double-sided, while the 256Mb sticks are single sided, so again i'm not too sure.Deejay said:crazy eddy , is 512 mb modules avialable too.....(Sunny told me these are 256 modules)
Are you sure about this? You did mention in another thread that the TwinMos you checked at Mnemonics was not CH-5. I have looked high and low for CH-5/UTT and so far have only seen CADT(Powerchip), CADT and more CADT ! The CADT is fairly decent (PCJedi got them up to 250Mhz, i havent gone more than 240Mhz on them as yet), but CH-5 would be more preferable.And 512MB modules are available but they are either CH-5 or 5ns powerchip which is not bad deal considering its 0.11m chips. It will mean they wont get too hot even at high voltages unlike bh-5 which is 0.175m chip.
Crazy_Eddy said:And in general guys, please bury the thought that these are going to outdo OCZ VX An equivalent chip to these from the OCZ Lineup would be "OCZ Gold" . They are BH-5 as well, sell at roughly the same price as the OCZ VX - yet more people are lining up for the VX.
Bro, you aint even got it in your hands as yet hyeah:anyways...this RAM is a gem..and i'm gonna keep it forever
Its not GoldVX. Its plain gold. Nice to see UTT coming to the indian market. BTW eddy what was the price of these things?SunMysore said:maybe they might
the GoldVX may sell better coz of the "VX" tag
anyways...this RAM is a gem..and i'm gonna keep it forever hyeah:
He was talking about the VX - i was tellin him the Gold is BH-5 yet people buy the VX. His reply was the "VX" tag makes people buy it.Chaos said:Its not GoldVX. Its plain gold. Nice to see UTT coming to the indian market. BTW eddy what was the price of these things?