tracerbullet
Discoverer
Chaos said:^^What hifi is something i don't trust at all :rofl:. Take reviews from what hifi with a pinch of salt. They give the highest ratings to the brands that pay them for the biggest ads .
That was a rather sensational comment Chaos, don't you think? No offence man but if you're against any specific publication then provide an authentic reason rather than: "They give the highest ratings to the brands that pay them for the biggest ads". How would you know? Have you worked with their management and found supporting directives? Or have do they trash the brands you've liked and upped those that's weren't that good?
Secondly, using ones ears for differentiating between companies may not be as simple as you advise. My mother may want to buy the best screen in the market but she won't, for the life of her, be able to differentiate the subtleties such as response time in one screen from another. Simply because she doesn't know what to look out for. Telling her "mom, use your eyes!" would be an utterly lame statement that wouldn't help her much. Rather, if I told her something like "mom, check if you find any sort of trailing of images on the screen," - that would be more helpful.
So, coming from a member who holds you in high regard, try to help out the guy instead of baselessly trashing a magazine, or asking him to use his ears.
Incidentally, I happen to know the what-hifi guys and I work in the media (first CHIP, now TOI) and I'd like to have you know that there's no correlation between ads and ratings regardless of how much ever you'd like to believe that there is.
In other words, we don't get paid to lick arse.
Peace out.