Suggest me IEM within 2.5 K

Status
Not open for further replies.
^ this is about the post not the item i bought ? i no in this case the item was returned to the sender, then they sent it again. have discussed about that earlier and in PMs wth you. ( hay, are you mocking me!??)
 
Guys what would you choose between Meelec M9 and SM PL30 in the sub 1.5K range?

What I read is that in M9 the bass is a bit overpowered - but can't it be corrected with correct EQ settings?

My bro has a taste similar to me - so I was first thinking oh PL 30. But now after reading the reviews of M9 I am thinking of what to get for him?

Experts pls suggest - specially those who have tried PL 30 and the M9 both.

--- Updated Post - Automerged ---

Here is the joker's review comparing them:

The PL30s have a very "fun" sound signature. The mids are forward, the whole signature is on the warm side, bass in punchy enough to be felt but definitely not heavy. They don't really have any glaring faults.

The Ai-M9 are much more detailed and have a better balance. They are more extended on both sides than the PL30s (they go higher and lower). The bass is clean and strong.

Unfortunately the Meelecs' cables are quite a bit more microphonic (possibly the worst in my current collection) and they only come with single-flange tips. Yes, the Ai-M9 pretty much have to be worn over-the-ear to reduce microphonics. I wear all IEMs over the ear, so the Ai-m9 work fine for me. You can get some silicone ear hooks from Phonak if you have a lot of trouble getting them to stay like that.

That said, I currently use the M6's much more than the M9's because the nicer form factor/fit pretty much causes them to sound better (even though its the same hardware underneath). The M6 are definitely a better earphone than the PL30s if you can live with the awful microphonics. The M9s are in much closer competition and if I had to keep one I would be inclined to pick the PL30s, if only because of the fit. Keep in mind these are all everyday/activity IEMs for me so comfort/microphonics have more weight than, say, for someone doing critical listening while stationary.
 
Could someone compare RE0,RE2,PL50 and M2 definitvely please, there's a lot of confusion.

Especially the build quality and comfort
 
^^ you can't compare RE-0 with the rest. It's not in the same price range.

But what I've learned is that M2 has the best build and sound quality between the rest three. RE-2 is good also in SQ but build quality is a concern to somebody.
 
The PL30s have a very "fun" sound signature. The mids are forward, the whole signature is on the warm side, bass in punchy enough to be felt but definitely not heavy. They don't really have any glaring faults.

The Ai-M9 are much more detailed and have a better balance. They are more extended on both sides than the PL30s (they go higher and lower). The bass is clean and strong.

Unfortunately the Meelecs' cables are quite a bit more microphonic (possibly the worst in my current collection) and they only come with single-flange tips. Yes, the Ai-M9 pretty much have to be worn over-the-ear to reduce microphonics. I wear all IEMs over the ear, so the Ai-m9 work fine for me. You can get some silicone ear hooks from Phonak if you have a lot of trouble getting them to stay like that.

That said, I currently use the M6's much more than the M9's because the nicer form factor/fit pretty much causes them to sound better (even though its the same hardware underneath). The M6 are definitely a better earphone than the PL30s if you can live with the awful microphonics. The M9s are in much closer competition and if I had to keep one I would be inclined to pick the PL30s, if only because of the fit. Keep in mind these are all everyday/activity IEMs for me so comfort/microphonics have more weight than, say, for someone doing critical listening while stationary.

I have heard to both M9 and PL30. I actually gave the PL30 to one of my friend after I got the M9's.

I have the same opinion as Joker's in the above post. The treble and bass of M9 were much better than the PL30. But sometimes I felt some harshness with the M9 treble. Overall I would prefer the M9's over the PL30 sound. The M9's cable which Joker mentioned has now changed to a better one and the new cable is really nice, I would say one of the best I have seen. On the other hand, the M6 and M11+ from Meelec has much better fit/comfort than the M9's. Also the build quality of the Meelec earphones are really great.

I have an almost new M11+ for sale. You can PM me if you are interested.
 
Too much fanboyism for M2. Is it that good? Gotta try it someday :P.

Anyways, I'd have suggested Xears TD100 which I have. It is rated 8 in ljokerl's thread for SQ compared to M2's 7.75 ;). Alas! Xears stopped selling it. Also, it's cables & stock tips are poor and needs to be babied a little. M2, on the other hand seems to have build quality on it's side.

It's upgraded version TDII is still around Rs. 2500 shipped (Euros 30 + 8 for shipping) and is said to have better build quality. May be I should try the TDII and then borrow / steal / loan a M2 and compare both side by side. But then.... I've too many IEMs and don't have space for another :ashamed:
 
Yes its really that good !!! :D

And please dont tell me your IEM collection is full. No chance in hell ! :)

ljokersl rankings are good but take them with a pinch of salt. I actually prefer the M1s to the M2s which is rated higher so it depends on user preferences.
 
^ I take ljokerl's ratings seriously because my pecking order and his are quite similar (barring some disagreements) ;)

IEM collection is not full, just a bit too crowded. I need to make some space. Once I make that space, I'll buy 4 more... oops! :ashamed:
 
The problem with the Brainwavz ones are Indian availability. Amarbir doesn't have stock still now. And I'm a bit worried about Indian Post/ Customs.
 
Trust me, they are worth more thn the additional 1K. Ask the audiophiles around.

The new one costs odd 4.5K. And its not even a month old.
 
^^ i want my re262 !! here. some one is holding it.give me my re262 !!:P

opps ...off topic.

btw i wont suggest re0 to anyone, you really might hate IEMs after listening to re0, cause of the hype, and its analytical sound (like sushant did)

BTW , 3.5 is great price for re0 ( as he has used it only for burning :P) and 6.75 with udac is even better, some one grab the deal( not not just anyone:P)
 
^ RE-0s were never hyped .They are legendary . Some of the IEMs costing even 4-5 times cant produce the treble detailing ,transparency and clean sound which RE-0 does. Everytime you try them you feel as if you are discovering new passages and detailing in your music which you had never heard before. As long as one doesn't mind super neutral and analytical IEMs , RE-0 are perfect . They sound pretty much like your K702s to be frank in terms of sound signature .Ofcourse 702s have insanely awesome soundstage and mids but the treble detailing is of that level with the RE-0.
 
but i would recommend my K702 to just about anyone and am sure he will definitely like them ( well not to someone who owns HD800 class HPs).when paired with good amp/dac the bass also shines( am sure it will , because the d1 somtimes give me hint for that)

but can you say the same about re0, i doubt that. i mean someone who is to step in to the IEM world, will you blindly recommend RE0 . (with K702 i would, paired with an amp for it )
 
^ I doubt if I would recommend K-702 and an amp. RE-0 or any other IEM trounces it in cost and convenience. And what makes you so sure that somebody won't hate the K-702? :P

RE0 are not "hyped". It just caters to one set of taste. Just because Sushant (and a few others) do not like it, does not make it "hype". It is what it is - an IEM beyond which you are seriously looking at law of diminishing returns in the analytical signature IEMs. Now, is it the best IEM money can buy? Probably not. It has it's own faults, quirks and irritants. But is any IEM perfect? Absolutely not.

Recommendation always has to cater to the budget, the person's taste and musical preferences, the kind of source he owns etc., And I don't think RE0 can be blindly recommended ..... nor is K-702 + Amp.
 
esanthosh said:
^ I doubt if I would recommend K-702 and an amp. RE-0 or any other IEM trounces it in cost and convenience. And what makes you so sure that somebody won't hate the K-702? :P

RE0 are not "hyped". It just caters to one set of taste. Just because Sushant (and a few others) do not like it, does not make it "hype". It is what it is - an IEM beyond which you are seriously looking at law of diminishing returns in the analytical signature IEMs. Now, is it the best IEM money can buy? Probably not. It has it's own faults, quirks and irritants. But is any IEM perfect? Absolutely not.

Recommendation always has to cater to the budget, the person's taste and musical preferences, the kind of source he owns etc., And I don't think RE0 can be blindly recommended ..... nor is K-702 + Amp.
I agree with santosh's words . Recommendation totally depends on person's music taste , preference and budget .

Whereas both RE0 and K702's are both legendary products . Recommended @ there price range . But then additional amping ( ohhh maannnn , why amping :( )
 
Status
Not open for further replies.