Thought about it & u know what, it doesnt matter whatever reply u get u will still believe what u wish to. Evrything is infront of u....kind of choosing between the red & the blue pill.
undertaker said:
in India Muslims have persecuted us Hindus for centuries
strange they r so incompetent, they cudnt wipe out the whole race even in centuries of their rule..........somewhere I hav seen mosques & temples build side by side......I wonder why did that.....oh probably to induce Hindus to embrace Islam....eh..but why do they did that....they cud have simply "FORCED" them...right?
And by ur statement it seems that the only ppl to reign on India were Muslims....& Britishers were Angels for us send to us by God to save us from these "basterds"
undertaker said:
carved a separate nation of (na)Pakistan
Now on this we have lots of literature.....it was pure politics dude....u take this...I take that....& foolishness & greed for power on the part of "our" so called leaders....Nehru & Sardar Patel...& ofcourse "their" leader Jinnah. The funny thing is Gandhi was elevated to a status from which ppl never expected him to handle such mean tasks as of that PM or President....talk of packaging...(Kotler borrowed that idea from us).
undertaker said:
still slaughter innocent Hindus in Kashmir
Now thats one huge unpardonable thing that calls for strict punishment.....
undertaker said:
Joke of the century !
Dude its the other way round. This is also pure politics. What Britisher did to India, the same was done there also, wherever they had colonies, they no more cud control, they decided to divide them so that the ppl never rest in peace....that Churchill was a son of a b**ch !!!
& one nore thing where was ISrael before the UN declaration...the Jews were scared from all over the world to filter into Jerusalem....a huge trick to weaken the Arab World, whose unity might have given trouble to other DEveloped & so called "civilised" nations....they used this issue to bring about differences between the Arabs & they suceeded just as they did in India.
undertaker said:
n Russia(chechnya) they kill Russians
I wonder how weak & coward Russians r they r getting killed by handful of Men.......I thot Russia was among the Power Blocks of thw world.
undertaker said:
So either Indians,Russians,Americans and Israelis are all mad people after Muslims or it is the very nature of Islam that is barbaric and opposed to peace?
No my dear, Indians, Russians, Americans, Israelis r not x,y,z...they r alll humans...& human have both gud & bad qualities...what comes out more depends upon the circumstances....
About the "Nature of Islam" ....dont see things in isolation...get the complete view....every religion in its early years of emergence had its part of violence...coz that was the way in the past...& today also..
undertaker said:
Hindustan is Hindu-sthan.Hindu-Kush in afghanistan stands for Hindu-slaughter. great Aryan region of Gandhar is now Kandahar= Kafir + Gandhar....
Oh really never knew about it ! I thot Hindustan was known so because of the Indus river known as Hind....
So what does Kush stands for....slaughter...in which language...
Gandhar....Kandhar....lol...they were so bad at making names...Kafirandhar wud have been more suitable.
And more question.....so why did all these yrs even during ur beloved British Raj..the names were used so...?
undertaker said:
in India they don't even mention 'jaziya tax' in books anymore
oh I too never read about Zakkaat tax (goes to the poor irrespective of them being Muslim, Hindu, Christian, Sikh...etc) that Muslims still pay according to their religion.
undertaker said:
What about the scores of Brahmin children adbucted by the Muslims and converted to Islam just to insult us(do not ask how I know this)
I'm James Bond (do not ask how I know this)!
undertaker said:
Qutub-Minar and I dunno whatever mosque that stands on remains of Hindu/jain temples.
The Stone Board there clearly states that the mosque there was made from stones gathered from the remains of "Jain & Buddhist" temples only, brought over from different places, no where it was mentioned that stones were from "Hindu" temple or that temples were demolished especially for this mosque or that the temples were demolished under the builder's regime, they were simply reused from the remains of the demolished temples that may have been demolished by.......anyone....of the early rulers....u know what I mean.
________________________________________________________
There's much more to know then what is written in RSS letterbooks
& one more thing no Hard feelings, i expressed ur views so i that ppl shud get the versions from both or may be all perpective.....Naipaul is not God...He is a biznesman...& he just does that...minds his own biznes...
U cant generalise or stereotype the whole sect like that...if Veerapan was a dacoit then that doesnt mean evry Hindu is.....If Britishers were cruel...that doesnt mean all of them are....If Hitler was cruel...it doesnt mean all Germans are...