Bheja fry, the epic tale ends.....

Status
Not open for further replies.
vijayninel said:
igo you are a royal bore.
Thank you for making my point. What I said earlier now is confirmed by you.

As for your rest of the blabber. I'll get back at that after by morning nap. I've been awake whole night working. Like I said earlier I'm no audiophile, but now that you have come to video, I can't wait to get back to you.
 
@vijay..

that was a looong and interesting conversation that you've been having here.. mind me butting in??

could you please tell me one simple thing? just that.. nothing else..

why did you buy a 9600GT graphics card? you did enjoy COD4 on a 6100 right? so why did you buy a 96GT?

especially when you have been making such blanket statments, why oh why??
 
sTALKEr said:
@vijay..

that was a looong and interesting conversation that you've been having here.. mind me butting in??

could you please tell me one simple thing? just that.. nothing else..

why did you buy a 9600GT graphics card? you did enjoy COD4 on a 6100 right? so why did you buy a 96GT?
especially when you have been making such blanket statments, why oh why??

well i dint say i enjoyed cod4 on 6100, i said i had played it, at least a part of it. i stopped playing the game for sometime because i wanted to enjoy it in my coming 9600gt. i have enjoyed other games on 6100 like battlefield2...etc.

dont you people get it?? i am not saying onboards are better than gcs i am saying onboards can to an extent run games.
if i could not have afforded a gc then i would have been enjoying onboard.

you can travel on a train or a plane, the plane is better if you can afford it take it or a train will do.
 
7 pages old and so much wiser already. :D

First he says it can be enjoyed on onboard- COD4 u pervs. :bleh:

Then he says he upgradedfrom 8600GT to 9600GT.

Now he says he didn't enjoy it on onboard- so stopped doing it till he got the 9600GT :rofl:- COD4 u sickos. :P

:O :rofl::rofl:
 
RiO said:
Untitled-1.gif

Awww, now why did you guys have to report his posts when such a healthy discussion is going on? I'm curious to see where this thread is headed... please rep hiiim before he is banned :P
Would have repped gladly if that id was short for 'Veejay Nina Manuel'. :P
But speak fast and it sounds something anatomical. :O
Undescribable here. :P
No offense and sincere apologies to the concerned person- just struck my sick brain. :ashamed:
 
BIKeINSTEIN said:
7 pages old and so much wiser already. :D

First he says it can be enjoyed on onboard- COD4 u pervs. :bleh:
Then he says he upgradedfrom 8600GT to 9600GT.
Now he says he didn't enjoy it on onboard- COD4 u sickos :P- so stopped doing it till he got the 9600GT. :rofl:

can you show me where in my posts have i written i enjoyed playing cod4 on 6100 and enjoyed it. i said i could run it. read before posting any garbage.
 
i am not disputing that. for all those features you need powerful hardware but even with all these cool features off i still say you can play and enjoy games. the most imp thing to play and enjoy games is not hardware but an imagination and enthusiasm for games. a lot of people in the world cant afford to buy expensive hardware they enjoy their games on their onboards.

Here perhaps?
 
vijayninel said:
you stupid fool, can you show me where in my posts have i written i enjoyed playing cod4 on 6100 and enjoyed it. i said i could run it. read before posting any garbage.

Hey, mind your language, man! I don't believe this is happening. TE is under attack by mindless know-it-alls!
 
Well, COD4 isn't mentioned explicitly. But, it is a fine example of the load an average game puts on a computer. So, it can be concidered as a reference for other normal games.
 
BIKeINSTEIN said:
7 pages old and so much wiser already. :D
First he says it can be enjoyed on onboard- COD4 u pervs. :bleh:

Then he says he upgradedfrom 8600GT to 9600GT.

Now he says he didn't enjoy it on onboard- so stopped doing it till he got the 9600GT :rofl:- COD4 u sickos :P

vijayninel said:
you stupid fool, can you show me where in my posts have i written i enjoyed playing cod4 on 6100 and enjoyed it. i said i could run it. read before posting any garbage.

Finally someone who could recognise the real me at first instance. :D
Have you heard of Coolio, the rapper??

I am F00lio, the spammer. :ohyeah:

vijayninel said:
you can play games of today with onboards. i could run cod4 with the outdated 6100 onboard. and the soundcards are mostly for fooling people. people think that they are getting better quality sound just because if it is comming from a card. if you were to put these people through a double blind test then they wouldn't be able to tell the difference between onboard and a card.:ohyeah:

vijayninel said:
noonboards cant go that far but you can play the game and enjoy it. there is a term known a audiophool, i suggest you reserch more on such people.

I may not be as bright as you are- infact- i am not bright at all- i am a stoopid fool- note the double 'o'. :P

But what else to make out from consecutive posts my friend- as per generally accepted norms of written communication?? :D

And if you are as wise as you seem- you must have heard the phrase- 'Never argue with a fool'. ;)

And with F00lio, the spammer- no chance. :rofl:

"You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in the court of F00lio"- old circus saying. :lol:
 
vijayninel said:
well i dint say i enjoyed cod4 on 6100, i said i had played it, at least a part of it. i stopped playing the game for sometime because i wanted to enjoy it in my coming 9600gt. i have enjoyed other games on 6100 like battlefield2...etc.

dont you people get it?? i am not saying onboards are better than gcs i am saying onboards can to an extent run games.
if i could not have afforded a gc then i would have been enjoying onboard.

you can travel on a train or a plane, the plane is better if you can afford it take it or a train will do.

^^^ eggjactly........the cheapness comes with its own riders...read problems...any card with sm 3,0 support will "RUN" the game, but there is a difference between running a game at 640X480/800X600 with almost all options turned off and running a game at 1280X1024 or higher with most option on and advanced filtering options turned on....fluid motion is very different from a stuttering frame rate...
Wrt to onboards , most ones are disabled cousins of their card brethen...half pipelines/sp disabled...and den there is the latency penalty for accessing the sytem memory.So even if newqer and "better" IGPs come to the scene they will still suck at playing the future games as the games themselves wud req better gpus...get this clear

wrt to larrabee intel has a lot to catch up..last time it was around doing anything wrthwhile was in the days of i740 .
and wrt to your rant abt sound cards maybe
1>Since it was "years ago" for which i assume ur were a noob back den ur friends duped you by passing off cheapo low grade L1 quotation stuff for "costly imported and better" equipment.

2>Speakers were crap

Apart from this i see no reason why ur vouching for onboard over a snd card ,,dats is i assume u can afford to buy one .
 
i am sorry i should not have used such language.

and yes if you read carefully i said you can enjoy, not i enjoyed cod4 on onboard.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.