I guess one has a choice here, do they want their vote to count for a local or national importance?
I feel a good leader at the top will be able to fix a lot of things, whereas the impact of a local leader may be limited. I would always vote for a party which would have a good leader and one which is truly secular and who believe in one country one law, rather to splitting it up for "vote banks"
Now this has hit the nail on the head. Our problem has not been Congress or BJP rather nationalism versus regionalism. Too many people are giving importance to the regional values while voting during in the "General Election". They forget the word general. Outcome is a hung parliament where even a regional party with 2-3 MPs can play the "kingmaker". They ask some atrocious portfolios just so that they can scam money out of it. If you go back and see AIADMK will form coalition with any government until they get some specific Tech related portfolios. Be it IT, Telecom etc. Similarly, a party in the Bihar/Bengal belt will pull the Railways portfolio.
So we need to empower our central government to avoid doing this. Pick a side - Rahul Gandhi or Narendra Modi and vote for them, not the regional lackeys who play on the regional sentiments.
Secondly, for guys talking about atrocious acts by Modi, he is guilty. So is Congress during the 1984 riots. This media hogwash over secularism is blinding us. Congress has systemically allowed Bangladeshi Muslim to come in via the border to play the "Muslim" Card. Those people can easily get a voter id card. Whom they do vote for? Obviously Congress. This is actually leads to burden on the system and needs to be discussed similar to immigration lines in the US. It is going to put undue stress on the system specially after the UID is implemented.
@
blkrb0t - Your defense of MM reminds me of a friend who really loves Mahatma Gandi (pls dont use that topic to go OT
). The points you put are all valid NGREA, UID, RTI etc but...
RTI - All good piece of legislature no doubt. The problem has been every one now wants an exemption. And they are getting one. For some really absurd reason. Why have RTI when everything needs to be "excluded".
NGREA - @
Superbad has clarified it well. It is a corruption pit.
UID - Less is said the better. No verification. Forced registration. How many cards do we need now? I heard there was another card on the horizon.
Indo-US nuclear deal - This one is tricky. India doesnt really need nuclear electricity if the power projects in Uttaranchal are carried out correctly. But MM will have us believe this is the way to go. Fact is many countries who are on nuclear power are trying to reduce their dependency. The cost of nuclear electricity is way higher than the benefits. One of them being dumping the waste.
Growth of Indian Railway - Could you be more specific? Indian Railway has done a volte face during the MM reign. They first separated IRCTC to a separate entity. Then when Mamta Banerjee came back she merged it back to Railways. So what was the point in separating? I know. We have too much money and time.
@
Crazy_Eddy - When we talk about Japan, arent we making a straw man argument here? How does Japan deflation tie into the India's uber high inflation? Inflation is necessary but not this high.
Also, personally Nitish Kumar is also a choice. He has transformed Bihar and many of us are now dreaming of returning to their state someday. Though I highly doubt he is famous on the national front.
OTOH, someone mentioned protest vote.
"Although, Rule 49 O of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 provides that an elector may refuse to vote after he has been identified and necessary entries made in the Register of Electors and the marked copy of the electoral roll, the
secrecy of voting is not protected here inasmuch as the polling officials and the polling agents in the polling station get to know about the decision of such a voter."
http://www.voteindia.in/news.php
And interestingly, it was used some where recently (albeit with a difference):
http://in.reuters.com/article/2013/02/25/us-italy-vote-idUSBRE91M0EB20130225