Buddy you keep arguing about everything. Simple question is, have you lived through the events that people have mentioned on this thread?
You are arguing when people speak of true incidents that have occurred in their lives, then you argue over printed reports stating that in other countries its a lot worst and why aint we talking about that. Learn to accept others viewpoint, there is a lot to learn from it.
Go back to my first few comments where i told you that it aint no point commenting on a public forum where there will always be people who will not understands the other persons point of view and will stretch it to a point, where nothing meaningful will come out of it.
Again @
TheIndian , how old are you? Im asking to understand if you have actually been through these eras that you seem to be defending.
Do I have to live through history to talk / discuss / argue about it (which I have)? If that is the case no one has the right to talk about anything until they were at least 5 years old.
As for question about my age, I deliberately did not answer the question as answering it would be the equivalent of telling everyone who was not there or not actually witnessed it to shut up and stay out of it. I am of the belief that being older does not make one wiser, and had wished to avoid age factor on a forum where quite a few are fairly young have often run into the wall of "I am older than you, shut up" at some point in their lives. As @
eternoMind pointed out, my age was easy enough to look up if anyone really desired so.
I have plenty of true incidents to speak of too for and against both, but what is more important, personal incidents with me or the generic behavior all around? I believe in the overall incidents all around. My not actually witnessing an event them does not make them false, we all have a mind which we can apply together with our own experiences and come to our own independent conclusions, whether to believe or not to believe.
As you mentioned there will be people who will always disagree and which is specifically why I stopped responding to your posts.
A simple glance at his TE profile would have answered that question for you !
@
TheIndian, you need to elaborate more what you mean because that post of yours above sounds like one from a right-wing nut job. No offense meant. You have traced too many issues there to the lack of one nation one law. Speaking of which, isn't the Uniform Civil Code a good example of the same. The one you seem to favor is one that leans more towards safeguarding the rights of the majority faith, with others getting lesser priority. I am just not able to locate the point on this thread when it became a faith pow-vow rather than one of political choice.
Also, what exactly horrified you about IITs and its students?
Thank you for answering the question about my age.
About IIT (and its not just about IIT, a few other top educational colleges are included) I was horrified FOR the students about the appalling conditions they are residing in. 8-10 hours a day no power, mosquitoes galore, no hot water in the midst of winter in North India, no Internet, horrendous food, stuffy class rooms, the list is endless, essentially the total lack of infrastructure. If this is case in our top 10-20 institutes what is it like in the rest of them? And yet our HONOURABLE education minister Mr Sibal was furious (to the point of foaming at the mouth) when a student disputed his claim that our educational institutes were world class and second to none.
Since I have become passionate about this subject (it was not always so) I have often come across terms like secularism, right wing ( I assume there must be a left wing too) and yet no one has been able to define what exactly they mean. I have got really vague answers and hope it will be different here someone could lay out a proper definition before we start using these terms, perhaps @
terence_fdes ( though it may appear other wise, I really enjoy his posts as being well thought out and informative)
You mentioned the Uniform Civil Code, is it really uniform ? Then how come no other religion gets the equivalent of "Haj subsidy" or why are some people allowed to marry 4 times and others are not? BTW a Muslim can't marry even two times (even though the law allows 4 times) in a Muslim country like Malaysia without the courts permission, let alone 4 times. Do I really need to go on about the uniformity of the law in India ? Or aren't the differences glaring enough? Every country has one code for a reason, why don't we? I do believe all our problems stem from lack of this, perhaps you could make me see from another POV, I am open to it.
How about reservations in jobs and education? Previously it was restricted to backward classes, and was to be for a period of about 25 years max, its what now? 50 with no signs of abating, only increasing. Where would you (or anyone) like to see this in the future? 95% reservation for various categories and religions or equality for all?
This does not mean I am not for helping the backward and downtrodden but giving is not helping. Where is the logic in a 95%er not getting admission and a 35% waltzing in? Perhaps help could be given by way of marks handicap, say 2/3 of 95 is the same as 95 for the down trodden. Which means the downtrodden would have to get about 62% at least if that was too much, it could be reduced and made to 1/2. But reserving on religious grounds? for "Minorities"? There are REAL minorities in India which form less than 1% or even 0.5% of the population, you do not see any special treatment being doled out to them (and IMHO they are really deserving), why ? BECAUSE THEY ARE POLITICALLY INSIGNIFICANT.
@
Brendon I would quickly like to say I CONDONE NO VIOLENCE but nor do I advocate turning the other cheek. More later.
considering his age, his views seem quiet shocking. He is obvious someone who would have gone through everything, right from the 70's and now i am even more surprised at his views. If u look at one of my previous posts, i asked him if he is in his teens and now that i know he is 48, clearly he has issues when it comes to people who dont belong to his same caste and religion.
@
TheIndian i think v would only run around in circles if i further communicate with you. You clearly are a man with an agenda, not one that i stand by even for a sec. Try to have an open mind, more than anything else, a open rational thought process is what our country needs the most at this hour...
It does seem to me that you have a serious age phobia, What age did you think I would be ? younger than you, implying you know more than me and therefore you are right? Too bad it didn't play out that way. Just cause someone is older than me, does not make them automatically right, similarly someone who is younger than me, does not make them automatically wrong either.
What does my age have anything to do with my beliefs, which of them shocks you specifically? That I believe in one nation one law, is that what is shocking?
FYI: With reference to your comment about having religious problems I am an atheist by choice and a Hindu by birth, but I DO NOT believe in caste or Religious discrimination and will fight tooth and nail against it. But perhaps you do as you are so focused on it.
I always refrain from making any personal attacks but since you have initiated it, and I am not one to turn the other cheek. Let me repeat some of the questions you have left unanswered.
1) why did the rioting in Gujarat Start? Any answer for it ?
2) What happened in the aftermath? Is it more peaceful than it has been in decades?( I too have Muslim friends there so I do know the ground reality) .
3) What do you feel about the various terrorism acts in the country which have been mostly promoted by Pakistan (yes Pakistan and not neighboring country) and still continue to do so.
4) Do you stand for one united nation one law and equality or a disjointed (vote bank) nation with many laws and reservations ? Please spell it out for us.
You accused me of pinching pennies about my age, which was there for you to see if you made even the slightest of effort, and yet chose to remain silent on matters of far more importance.
And finally YES I have an agenda, and its very transparent. In case you missed it - One nation one law, equality for all, preferential treatment only for the economically and socially down trodden, and for the REAL MINORITIES. - If any part of it is objectionable or biased please say so, I would be happy to alter my outlook.